Which comes first: the Mistaker or the Mistaken?

Posted by Buck68 on May 2nd, 2013 filed in Human Nature, Politics
Comment now »

by Buck68™, May 2nd, 2013
©2013 by Buck68™, all rites re-served. Each use whatsoever requires prior written permission from the author [email abuck68@yahoo.com]

Today, i stumbled across, then read, this article about those incestuous Republicans:
Red State Editor article

Then, it happened that the following words be:

Upon what comes first, all else depends.

Does what I think, come first?
Does what I feel, come first?
Does whether I agree or not, come first?

If I am not first, in some form or other; then, what I feel or think or aware about some one or some thing else, cannot be first, be cause that requires me first.

So, neither me, nor anything of me of whatever emotion, thought, intention, or action… comes first.

The Great Mistaker comes first. Otherwise, how can the hosts and popularities and so wrongs of the mistaken … be known … totally, honestly, actually, really…? Thus, the totallies and empathies and noises of the Great Mistaker, come first. Who but The Great Mistaker should be entrusted with ‘whatever and everything that needs to be done’ … ‘if even only one can be saved’?

What is as stake for you and I here? The you and I – the good, trusting, loyal followers of the One we gave and give again our Hope and Change to?

We are trading our freedom, our choices, our rights …for the promises of security and safety. This trade, with anyone OTHER than The Great Mistaker… would be what? Sweet… or Not A Sweet? Besides very popular as long as you are IN and meme/mantra by feel/say/think/do EXACTLY as you are told.

So, to this Editor of Red State who is so “deeply troubled” about the two ends [one and the “other”] of a racist, extremist, oppressive bunch of Mistakens or much worse – what does this person matter? What, at this point, does any person from one to the other end of this bunch, matter?

Anyway, this Editor knows far more about the people he names than he says about himself. He only proves he is… mistaken. And no one but the Great Mistaker knows just how deeply and widely and inappropriately this Editor is… mistaken.

Yes, the “track record” of the “mistaken” “would have you believe”… whatever. And that would be… the… Big Mistake.

And truly truly, “the one hope” is in the One we give our Hope to, and must ‘never go back’ to “distance” our selves from.

Now as a professional so wrong Mistaken of Whatever, I do sincerely know one thing: don’t give your hope to me!

The Inciteful Potpourri of Diversity [IPOD]

Posted by Buck68 on April 22nd, 2013 filed in Human Nature, Politics
Comment now »

by Buck68™, April 22nd, 2013
©2013 by Buck68™, all rites re-served. Each use whatsoever requires prior written permission from the author [email abuck68@yahoo.com]

Today I read the Miami Herald “debate” article and the 241 comments on Google Plus as of 1030 this morning EST.

Miami Herald debate about the Boston… suspects

and…

G+ public comments on Miami Herald article

Do I ‘have’ any answers? No. Does every person have feelings, biases, and motivations? Yes. Do all people, by Scientific definition, have ‘awareness’, the power of reason, and the freedom to feel, think, say, do… whatever? The continual cacophony of Passions and Noises to the contrary notwithstanding… yes.

Yes, but? No – the ‘but’, is gone. The limit, the foundation, the cornerstone by which the human beings in the land of the USA could e pluribus unum morally and rationally… is …gone.

SEPARATED from the Perfect by choice, interpretation, and/or government imposition, there is no “self-evident truth”… no moral standards with which to seek, comprehend, or apply “justice”. Into this vacuum humbly step each and of all the usual charades of men. The Life Game is Survival of the Fittest [me] by Natural Selection – the fact-based Process of Evolution. These days, we have a President who has declared “if we can save even one, we must do everything we can by all means necessary.” When, where, why, for what? Answer: for whatever The Leader – the Commander in Chief – declares ‘it’ …to be. “We” means the human nature of ME and My IN people.

So, this thing in Boston is a happening like every happening. It is EXACTLY what The Leader says it is. Pay attention, people! He is elected by We The People. He Has The Power. All connections between happenings are… whatever the Leader says they are, or are not, or have “evolved”.

So, what has He said about these five questions?

Q1 What has happened at the Boston Marathon?
A1 It is a “terrorism”. What does that mean? Whatever He says. These extremist personal attacks on our President by claims of government cover-ups and conspiracies are simply so wrong be cause He leads this Administration. IF there is a rogue or isolated inappropriate in this Administration of millions of dedicated public servants – He will find him by all means necessary and fix it by Executive Action. So everybody from that wacko southern Senator Lindsay Graham to the horribly misguided and duped ACLU, to stupid people everywhere, to disloyal or extremist media – need to stop immediately and Follow our Leader.

Q2 What powers does the Chief Executive have?
A2 The power to say anything is whatever He says it is, whenever He empathizes, exactly as He evolves. People, all any person has to do is listen and follow. Why would any of us not follow our Hope in whatever changes He makes?

Q3 What does the law say to do?
A3 This is kind of a trick question, since Diversity and you must respect everyone and everything. The President has the power to ‘get justice’ by whatever. He sees, He says, He decides. For example, He uses “empathy”. He decides whatever a law means, or doesn’t mean, or means sometimes to some and not others. He decides whether to enforce, ignore, or reinterpret a law; or, to do whatever regardless of law. It is a fact we have thousands upon thousands of conflicting, confusing laws so why is it not self-evident that we always need our Leader’s Interpretation of them? It is…for your safety.

Q4 What have government officials of this country legally done so far?
A4 This is kind of another trick question. Fortunately we have The Leader who looks into our past and knows which official, which prior Administration, did wrong or legally wrong or whatever bad by whatever name or feeling. He looks into the past so We The People can just move on and Progress however He tells us to evolve. The past? “At this point, what does it matter”? The Leader says Lean Forward! Are you IN?

Q5 What facts and how many facts do we ‘know for a fact’ so far?
A5 Could be the basic trick question behind all trick questions. “WE” don’t know. They don’t know. I don’t know. Even you don’t know. Everyone from the First Ever, Second Most Smartest Ever Person on down by Equal Access to Whatever… doesn’t know.

But He, he knows. He knows fact. He knows appropriate. He Progresses by Evolving. For you older folks, He is the light at the end of the tunnel.

And the Light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it.

A speech on principle, but not of principle

Posted by Buck68 on April 11th, 2013 filed in Human Nature, Politics
Comment now »

by Buck68™, April 11th, 2013
©2013 by Buck68™, all rites re-served. Each use whatsoever requires prior written permission from the author [email abuck68@yahoo.com]

The title is my understanding of Rand Paul’s speech the other day.
Rand Paul remarks at Howard University

So Buck68, you arrogant jerk… what do YOU say? Read on….

We seek what we have already been given: freedom, choice, awareness. We claim what we can never possess: truth, love, integrity, trust…. As much as we have been given to know of right and wrong, we know we ought to stand on moral principle. But who among us can extricate our mind or our soul from our own desires, intentions, or perceptions of our heart?

Each of us, and groups of us, are the basic reason to limit government to the essentials of protecting this nation in this world, from all enemies, foreign or domestic. We divide our government against itself, in hope that a divided house cannot stand upon its people. Yet, in self-evident fact… power corrupts individuals and groups. So I ask you: is it the popular glorious Progress of Man… or the same old cycle of men? Fact-based Science declares our ultimate reality: natural laws of random determinism, all producing entropy. Math puts it simply: any imperfect times another imperfect never produces better or the same – only worse, or less.

So, by all things known to men, we can prove our hopelessness, our corruption, our manipulations. Who is not a veteran of envy, blame, greed?

Therefore, if there is faith, hope, love – it ought to be in something greater than men; greater than that person looking back at me in my mirror.

Practically, if there is all creation and creating; how can there not be a Creator? Yet by every means known to man, how can any of us ever know ‘for sure’ about any Person… greater than homo sapiens, the self-anointed Kings of the earthy Animal Kingdom?

But I don’t come or presume to tell you anything that each of you do not already know…or just don’t want to know. I come as an American recognizing that we either work toward e pluribus unum… or work harder destroying each other and desecrating the house others fought and died to consecrate, to hallow… for future Americans.

So, may we, here, now, TODAY… rededicate our selves to noble purpose despite our nature? May we, here, now, TODAY… put our lives and our fortunes in the great perspective of… our sacred honor? I have ZERO sacred honor… where can I get some?

How did our imperfect forefathers and founders of this Nation, try to deal with human nature and our recurring tyrannies and slaveries against our fellow man?

Imperfectly.

But, they did start with man’s First Question: Who’s the Ultimate Authority?

They did take “my rights” out of my authority, or any group’s authority – and by the self-evidence of all CREATION – however any person perceived it – put human rights and moral Authority – above our glorious heroic natural clutches and maneuvers.

And, and after decades of trying to have it all our usual ways… “gave us a Republic… if you can keep it”. So said Ben Franklin. You know – Uncle Ben, the womanizing fat old white guy gracing that $100 bill of lesser value daily?

Who in their right mind would follow… such a person?

Who in their right mind, would give his hope … his faith … his passion – to anyone or anything except… Ultimate Authority?

Who… besides you and I and our fellow Americans?

So my appeal to you here, TODAY, has zero moral or right or practical authority inasmuch as it is MY appeal.

My appeal is to you in the Name of Jesus Christ, especially to those of any of man’s religions and atheists. My reasons are practical. First, be cause Jesus invites individuals to come to Him. Be cause He walked among men? No. Even be cause He laid down His life for whosoever believeth in Him? No. Be cause Christ does not impose. Read it yourself: Christ does not impose. Christians impose! Christ does not impose. I cannot say the same for my self, nor any of the organizings or denominations of men.

AND be cause this Nation was founded on The Creator’s self-evident truths… Americans of all beliefs have the best protection men can provide for our individual freedom and choices.

Can we see what we have done with ‘the best’ that we have been given and blessed with? We have a lot of work to do. In each generation. Or, we will keep killing, we will keep indenturing, our children.

So…what to do?

Not ‘more’. Not ‘spending’ what we do not have. Not reinventions, messages, lying, stimulating, imaging, studies, grants, campaigning, benefiting, excepting, waivering our selves & my IN crowd.

Not “reforms”. No re – forming the same stuff in an attractive stimulant. Not evermore pogroms to “raise awareness”.

Renewal. Revival. A shadow of… rebirth.

Two specifics I leave you to consider:

First, Education. Government is anathema to education, just as controlling is anathema to learning and thinking for yourself. Turn on your TV or goto any ‘social media’… THIS is the pandemic entropy of government in education. THIS is why …the individual educates …and the effective teacher is a student of how to learn.

Second, money. As an American, I Owe You. IOU means I owe you for every IOU some “civil servant” writes, omits, avoids, borrows, spends, pretends by any means. “Getting” is taking, stealing.

So, at last, here are you and I, about to go our ways again. If we are human, Science already defines us as “aware”. Our freedom has been given when our soul first entered our body. My gift is mine, your gifts are yours – without measure. Your freedom. Use it yourself… or someone who sincerely cares… will use yours on you!

After all… I’m only human.

Marriage

Posted by Buck68 on March 26th, 2013 filed in Human Nature, Politics
Comment now »

by Buck68™, March 26th, 2013
©2013 by Buck68™, all rites re-served. Each use whatsoever requires prior written permission from the author [email abuck68@yahoo.com]

References:
1-NYT article on Supreme Court marriage case
2-what's an oxymoron?
3-case background
4-the law of the nature of rights

The NYT headline says, “Justices to Hear California Case on Same-Sex Marriage Ban Today”. Writer Adam Liptak’s lead sentence reads, “The Supreme Court will hear arguments on Tuesday morning on the meaning of marriage.” I wonder. Really? What is “the meaning of marriage”?

“Gay Marriage” is one of a number of Diversity in University oxymora that destroy the essential, rational human communications building block of definition. But this destruction of public and social reason is secondary to its supplanting of morals. For, intrinsically in the concept of morals for all humans – compared to ethics, mores, norms, or the ubiquitous ‘whatever’ – is the authority for said morals. A common term for this authority above and beyond human capacity, is “religion” – organized versions of human ‘belief in’.

Rationally, human communication depends on definition of terms, which enable empirical [aka scientific] describing and informing. Definition answers the question, ‘what does it mean’ – not whether what the definition describes is right or wrong. Yet definitions are essential to the concept of ‘fact’, as compared to opinion, or speculation. In logic – simplistically the forms of applying reason – definitions are essential to how to reason accurately. It is no small irony that how to reason is short sweet simple and inclusive… compared to the legions of… logical fallacies.

Both the limits of reason, and the enduring human penchant for logical fallacies, suggest not only the concept of right and wrong, but the necessity for the Highest Authority for what is right and wrong. I.E., morals. For what is human communication, absent or in relativity with the moral of ‘honesty’? Expressed rationally, what is human communication if deception is… “appropriate”?

As a matter of fact in logic, the correct terms “appropriate” and “inappropriate”, with which ‘experts’ have supplanted the terms right and wrong, themselves illustrate the necessity of deception in avoiding moral authority. Simply, who says what is appropriate, or not?

So, TODAY, as the United States Supreme Court hears another case for legitimizing yet another oxymoron, any decision it makes will logically repress, delegitimize, or ban… the Creator-given inalienable rights the Creator endowed to all people, regardless of our continuing attempts to deprive each other of them.

TODAY, SCOTUS will, as the trendy sayings go, ‘fight back’, ‘get justice’, ‘get fairness’, ‘free the oppressed’, ‘have social justice’…or not. All modifiers of… justice.

What is this but just [pun intended] as you and I reveal in our self-deceptions of whatever words, often overtly exempting ourselves with ubiquitous terms such as “totally, honestly, actually, really”. We feel so good [or bad, or whatever] about ourselves, we can hardly get through our next deception without their cover….

SEPARATED, is any person unequal if the Creator created us? We are only unequal if Survival of the Fittest is our amoral, ‘natural’ rule for ‘what happens’. So TODAY, SCOTUS will hear two adversaries, each making THEIR case for ‘Natural Selection’ [who wins]. Absent or SEPARATED from moral Authority, there is no moral ‘friend of the court’ – only weaker predators taking sides with big predators, just like Science tells us the animals do. And maybe some plants too?

So, what’s this Progress, but nothing new under the sun. No small irony – fighting back for a right by a wrong in order to impose yet another selfishness by redefinition… on whosoever, by all means necessary. Science defines the inevitable result of this Progress: “entropy”. Or is Science inappropriate, and ‘we’ ‘just’ ‘have to teach’ that Mommies who teach their kids that “two wrongs don’t make a right” are… inappropriate?

Mean-while, [pun intended] you just KNOW by feeling that, if even one can be saved… we must do all that is necessary… to everyone [except my side].

Once, a very few ordinary men did an ordinary thing: they risked lives and fortunes. What was extraordinary was their motivation: sacred honor. That motivation was predicated, by definition, on “sacred”. TODAY… this is ‘inappropriate’. Totally. Honest. TODAY you “have faith” that “works for me”.

TODAY…SEPARATED… there is no rational or moral basis for “united”, or e pluribus unum. Your overseers by whatever label, produce evermore laws and rules and decisions and memos and announcements and exemptions and waivers and exclusions and impositions and pogroms to ‘raise your awareness’ and …not a taxes. All for you…for your safety…for fairness…to contribute evermore to the neverending fight against ‘them’ – the ones to blame – the isolated or profiled ‘harmers’. So if you are not IN… you are… ?

Now…you ‘just’ move on. Feel think say do EXACTLY as you are told. In public testimony under oath by The State to the representatives you elected, this is your state: “At this point…what difference does it make?”

The Imposition of Meaning

Posted by Buck68 on February 28th, 2013 filed in Human Nature, Politics
Comment now »

by Buck68™, February 28th, 2013
©2013 by Buck68™, all rites re-served. Each use whatsoever requires prior written permission from the author [email abuck68@yahoo.com]

What is the effect on everything, when I feel right in my own mind? I struggle with grasping the entropic effect of me – ever so slightly imperfect as I humbly am…am – converting reality into my perceptions. Fortunately, Science has defined Entropy …so it is both “fact-based” and rig-or-us-ly peer re-viewed. Anything else is… “inappropriate”, so I’m told.

The problem is, “I’m OK with that”, as one fearful and wonderful person puts it. That’s only a problem if ‘reality’ is… reality, not what I feel about reality. But really – “here I go again”? Am I making a problem out of… ‘no big deal’? Is Me – trying to impose whatever feels real to me; on you and whoever, however – a big deal?

No. Not when you can ignore me. Or delete or ban me so you don’t see or hear anything from me via the internet. Or your group. Or maybe when you use me as something to laugh at or objectify or blame or degrade. Every joke needs a …butt. Those of us ‘to blame’ – do we not serve an essential function for our betters?

Only when… yes I can… are my feelings a big deal… to you. As I, by all means necessary, Get Power from your… perceptions. Then – I Invest that Power in Me – to make, force, compel you to comply or else. Or else what? Or else face My Justice, in all the ways I can jail, penalize, brand, demonize, or ostracize you. Imposition is a big deal. Imposition is that precise, sexually explicit, relational, whispered phrase in a smiling aside to our President, from our Vice President. Who could put it better? Who could make it simpler?

Do you ‘get the Message’? Are you IN if you are ‘on Message’? If you are IN, can you get an exemption? A waiver, a favor? A living wage by ‘doing something’, or not? ‘Access’ to… whatever?

What could be simpler than if you are “special”, you get specials? And if you have too much, you must keep giving more until whatever is Fair? And if even 1 can be saved from whatever, you all must pay more [not a tax] and get more restrictions?

What if Imposition is simply just the charisma of the bully pulpit? Is it OK if it is “investing in Education”? Is Imposition good if it Has Vision? A Vision Statement? A Bible? Any Holy Book? A Village? A Culture? Diversity? Have I originated any idea, any clue here? It’s just my feelings, my sincere perceptions.

So what’s the deal? If communication were as simple as using dictionary definitions of words, we could just look them up and others would know what we… mean… by using that word.

But, if a word means what I feel it means at the time, then a word could mean… whatever. Whatever by any feeling by any person. Or a thing. And I could have no specific recollection of my feeling about a word at some time, before. Who remembers each of their feelings at any specific time, especially when stimulated, excited, or in some passion?

So who can tell another a meaning of a word at any time, if the user or thing itself can not remember?

Thank the Scientific Forward Progress of Entropy. Thank Getting Our Justice by Empathy. Thank Polling. Thank Ad-Ver-tising. Thank Imaging, Branding, Messaging, and Stimulations – and the Toys of Technologies [TOTS].

When you have Random Determinism, whatever happens and is totally determined. Meaning is so outdated! Value feelings.

NOW, we do not need math, or English, or history… or dictionaries… or language. Or Hope or Cope, for the Scope of the Rope in our oh so Exceptional Etats Unis Soap.

Turn On … entertainment and getting whatever.
Tune In … to excited.
Be IN … Drop Out.

So… what DOES each person need?

Perhaps each person needs what all our noises and feelings cry out for: meaning. The precise thing all experts and government pro-grams pro-mise … yet deliver re-gress: “raising awareness”.

For who among us can recognize rational accuracy, much less seek The Truth – when lying doesn’t rise to the level?

Who can stand on any meaning, that falls by anyone for anything that seems right at the moment?